<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Working for Safety</title>
	<atom:link href="http://workingforsafety.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://workingforsafety.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:41:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on CWS In The News: I2P2 Debate Ahead by CWS In The News: I2P2 Debate Ahead – Working for Safety &#124; Injury Prevention</title>
		<link>http://workingforsafety.com/2011/03/04/cws-in-the-news-i2p2-debate-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>CWS In The News: I2P2 Debate Ahead – Working for Safety &#124; Injury Prevention</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingforsafety.com/?p=401#comment-975</guid>
		<description>[...] the article here: CWS In The News: I2P2 Debate Ahead – Working for Safety     &#8592; Staying with Sens &#039;the right decision&#039; for Phillips &#124; Ottawa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the article here: CWS In The News: I2P2 Debate Ahead – Working for Safety     &#8592; Staying with Sens &#039;the right decision&#039; for Phillips | Ottawa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CWS Spokesman To Tell Congress of OSHA Priorities by Shopfloor &#124; A Manufacturing Blog Featuring Manufacturing Strategies</title>
		<link>http://workingforsafety.com/2011/02/14/cws-spokesman-to-tell-congress-of-osha-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator>Shopfloor &#124; A Manufacturing Blog Featuring Manufacturing Strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingforsafety.com/?p=386#comment-970</guid>
		<description>[...] the Coalition for Workplace Safety, so we pass on this from the Coalition&#8217;s website, &#8220;CWS Spokesman To Tell Congress of OSHA Priorities&#8220;: From the House Education and Workforce [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Coalition for Workplace Safety, so we pass on this from the Coalition&#8217;s website, &#8220;CWS Spokesman To Tell Congress of OSHA Priorities&#8220;: From the House Education and Workforce [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OSHA Issues NPRM on Walking-Working Surfaces by eric</title>
		<link>http://workingforsafety.com/2010/05/24/osha-issues-nprm-on-walking-working-surfaces/comment-page-1/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingforsafety.com/?p=260#comment-965</guid>
		<description>A 20 ft fixed metal ladder in a refinery has 2 inch rungs, 13 inches apart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 20 ft fixed metal ladder in a refinery has 2 inch rungs, 13 inches apart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CWS Files Comments Regarding OSHA&#8217;s Consultation Program by Shopfloor &#124; A Manufacturing Blog Featuring Manufacturing Strategies</title>
		<link>http://workingforsafety.com/2010/10/29/cws-files-comments-regarding-oshas-consultation-program/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Shopfloor &#124; A Manufacturing Blog Featuring Manufacturing Strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingforsafety.com/?p=356#comment-962</guid>
		<description>[...] productive and safer for their employees. The NAM joined with numerous other organizations in the Coalition for Workplace Safety’s comments to OSHA which urged the agency not to remove important aspects of the program that encourage company [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] productive and safer for their employees. The NAM joined with numerous other organizations in the Coalition for Workplace Safety’s comments to OSHA which urged the agency not to remove important aspects of the program that encourage company [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OSHA Needs to Explain Their Unfounded Noise Proposal by Gregory T Strudwick</title>
		<link>http://workingforsafety.com/2010/12/14/osha-needs-to-explain-their-unfounded-noise-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory T Strudwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingforsafety.com/?p=370#comment-959</guid>
		<description>Here again OSHA forges ahead with out regard for the stakeholders input. We need to de-rail their ability to make changes to any standard with out a negociated effort to address every issue that has a recognized impact on all parties involved. The sooner we challenge their misguided mandates the sooner we will force real and appropriate change. It&#039;s up to those of us who understand that working together is the only way to achieve a credible resolution to improve work place safety, resolve that we can all support based on fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here again OSHA forges ahead with out regard for the stakeholders input. We need to de-rail their ability to make changes to any standard with out a negociated effort to address every issue that has a recognized impact on all parties involved. The sooner we challenge their misguided mandates the sooner we will force real and appropriate change. It&#8217;s up to those of us who understand that working together is the only way to achieve a credible resolution to improve work place safety, resolve that we can all support based on fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CWS Files Comments Regarding OSHA&#8217;s Consultation Program by Shopfloor &#124; A Manufacturing Blog Featuring Manufacturing Strategies</title>
		<link>http://workingforsafety.com/2010/10/29/cws-files-comments-regarding-oshas-consultation-program/comment-page-1/#comment-947</link>
		<dc:creator>Shopfloor &#124; A Manufacturing Blog Featuring Manufacturing Strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingforsafety.com/?p=356#comment-947</guid>
		<description>[...] OSHA has given the public a mere 60 days to comments on one of the most expansive proposals that the agency has crafted during this Administration, an unreasonably short period given the sweeping changes that are being sought. That’s why the National Association of Manufacturers and numerous other groups are requesting an extension to the comment deadline. Our request is available here, and the request from the Coalition for Workplace Safety is available here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OSHA has given the public a mere 60 days to comments on one of the most expansive proposals that the agency has crafted during this Administration, an unreasonably short period given the sweeping changes that are being sought. That’s why the National Association of Manufacturers and numerous other groups are requesting an extension to the comment deadline. Our request is available here, and the request from the Coalition for Workplace Safety is available here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CWS Sends Letter To House of Reps on H.R. 5663 by A Wink, a Nod and a Hard-to-Predict Primary North Capitol Street</title>
		<link>http://workingforsafety.com/2010/07/26/cws-sends-letter-to-house-of-reps-on-h-r-5663/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>A Wink, a Nod and a Hard-to-Predict Primary North Capitol Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingforsafety.com/?p=335#comment-288</guid>
		<description>[...] CWS Sends Letter To House of Reps on H.R. 5663 – Working for Safety [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CWS Sends Letter To House of Reps on H.R. 5663 – Working for Safety [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CWS Testifies Before House on HR 5663 (Miner Safety and Health Act of 2010) by WSJ: &#8220;Employer Groups Criticize Mine-Safety Bill&#8221; &#8211; Working for Safety</title>
		<link>http://workingforsafety.com/2010/07/13/cws-testifies-before-house-on-hr-5663-miner-safety-and-health-act-of-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>WSJ: &#8220;Employer Groups Criticize Mine-Safety Bill&#8221; &#8211; Working for Safety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 23:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingforsafety.com/?p=312#comment-208</guid>
		<description>[...] the voices dissenting against the bill is CWS and Morgan Lewis attorney Jonathan Snare, who testified this week against the bill: Jonathan Snare, a lawyer representing an employer group called the Coalition for Workplace Safety, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the voices dissenting against the bill is CWS and Morgan Lewis attorney Jonathan Snare, who testified this week against the bill: Jonathan Snare, a lawyer representing an employer group called the Coalition for Workplace Safety, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CWS Testifies Before House on HR 5663 (Miner Safety and Health Act of 2010) by Proposed OSHA Act Changes Could Hurt Business &#124; FDRsafety</title>
		<link>http://workingforsafety.com/2010/07/13/cws-testifies-before-house-on-hr-5663-miner-safety-and-health-act-of-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Proposed OSHA Act Changes Could Hurt Business &#124; FDRsafety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingforsafety.com/?p=312#comment-207</guid>
		<description>[...] To read the full text of Snare’s statement, click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To read the full text of Snare’s statement, click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About CWS by Today&#8217;s Workplace &#187; House Hearing Focuses on Mine, Workplace Safety</title>
		<link>http://workingforsafety.com/about-cws/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Today&#8217;s Workplace &#187; House Hearing Focuses on Mine, Workplace Safety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workingforsafety.com/about-cws/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>[...] attempt by the National Association of Manufacturers, the US Chamber of Commerce, and more than 20 other industry groups to oppose fundamental improvements to the 40-year-old OSHA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attempt by the National Association of Manufacturers, the US Chamber of Commerce, and more than 20 other industry groups to oppose fundamental improvements to the 40-year-old OSHA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: workingforsafety.com @ 2012-02-06 04:56:55 -->
